http://blog.liquibase.org/2009/01/a-note-on-version-numbering.html Database Change Management: The Blog Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:04:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.liquibase.org/2009/01/a-note-on-version-numbering.html/comment-page-1#comment-1102 Carsten Lenz Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:23:14 +0000 http://blog.liquibase.org/?p=61#comment-1102 I think that's simply logical. It makes no sense to "allow" just ten Version between 1.0 and 2.0 (1.0-1.9) :D By the way, that also how we manage version numbers with our governmental client. I think that’s simply logical. It makes no sense to “allow” just ten Version between 1.0 and 2.0 (1.0-1.9)
By the way, that also how we manage version numbers with our governmental client.

]]> http://blog.liquibase.org/2009/01/a-note-on-version-numbering.html/comment-page-1#comment-1100 Nayan Hajratwala Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:44:03 +0000 http://blog.liquibase.org/?p=61#comment-1100 That's how Maven version numbering works as well, so at least the Maven users will have no problems with it. That’s how Maven version numbering works as well, so at least the Maven users will have no problems with it.

]]>